What are Agreed Upon Procedures
Understanding Agreed Upon Procedures in auditing involves recognizing that they are a specialized type of engagement performed by an independent auditor, where the auditor carries out specific procedures on a subject matter and reports the factual findings to the client. Unlike a traditional audit or review, an AUP engagement does not result in an opinion or conclusion about the subject matter’s overall fairness or compliance with relevant standards or regulations.
Purpose and Benefits of Agreed Upon Procedures
Agreed Upon Procedures can serve various purposes and offer several benefits, including:
1. Flexibility: AUP engagements are tailored to the specific needs of the organization and the intended users of the report, focusing on areas of particular concern or interest. This allows for a more targeted and efficient approach to addressing specific issues or risks.
2. Cost-effectiveness: Since AUP engagements are typically narrower in scope than traditional audits or reviews, they can be more cost-effective, especially for smaller organizations or those with limited resources.
3. Factual findings: The AUP report presents the factual findings of the procedures performed, without providing an opinion or conclusion. This allows the intended users of the report to draw their conclusions based on the reported findings.
4. Enhanced credibility: Engaging an independent auditor to perform Agreed Upon Procedures can enhance the credibility of the organization’s financial reporting and internal controls, providing stakeholders with greater confidence in the reliability of the information presented.
5. Compliance and risk management: AUP engagements can be used to assess specific aspects of an organization’s compliance with laws, regulations, or contractual agreements, as well as to identify and address potential risks or areas of concern.
Differences Between Agreed Upon Procedures and Traditional Audits
Understanding Agreed Upon Procedures in auditing also involves recognizing their differences from traditional audits:
1. Scope: AUP engagements are limited to the specific procedures agreed upon between the auditor and the client, while traditional audits cover a broader scope, examining the organization’s overall financial reporting and internal control environment.
2. Reporting: In an AUP engagement, the auditor reports the factual findings of the agreed-upon procedures without providing an opinion or conclusion. In contrast, a traditional audit results in an opinion on the fairness of the organization’s financial statements in accordance with applicable accounting standards.
3. Assurance: AUP engagements do not provide assurance on the subject matter’s overall fairness, accuracy, or compliance. Instead, they focus on the factual findings of the procedures performed. Traditional audits provide a higher level of assurance, as the auditor expresses an opinion on the financial statements.
Selecting the Right Procedures for an Agreed Upon Procedures Engagement
The process of selecting the right procedures for an AUP engagement involves understanding your company’s specific needs and working closely with your chosen auditor. Here are some steps to guide you through the process:
1. Identify the Objective
Before selecting the procedures, it’s essential to determine the objective of the AUP engagement. Are you looking to verify the accuracy of a specific financial statement? Or do you need to assess the effectiveness of a particular internal control? Having a clear objective will help you choose the appropriate procedures for your engagement.
2. Consult with Your Auditor
Engage in a detailed discussion with your auditor about the nature of your business, the scope of the AUP, and the specific areas you want to focus on. Your auditor can help you identify the most relevant and effective procedures based on their experience and expertise.
3. Review Regulatory Requirements
It’s essential to consider any regulatory requirements that may apply to your company when selecting procedures for an AUP engagement. For instance, if you operate in a highly regulated industry, you may need to include procedures that test compliance with specific regulations.
4. Consider the Materiality of the Information
When selecting the right procedures for an Agreed Upon Procedures engagement, consider the materiality of the information being tested. Materiality refers to the significance of the information in the context of your company’s overall financial statements. Focus on procedures that will provide the most valuable insights into the areas of highest materiality.
5. Be Specific and Detailed
The procedures agreed upon should be specific, detailed, and measurable. Ambiguity in the procedures may lead to confusion and inconsistencies in the execution and reporting of the engagement. Be clear about what each procedure entails and the expected outcome.
Understanding Agreed Upon Procedures in auditing is essential for organizations to make informed decisions about their financial reporting and risk management processes. Additionally, selecting the right procedures for an Agreed Upon Procedures engagement is a crucial step towards ensuring the accuracy and reliability of your company’s financial information.
By recognizing the purpose, benefits, and differences between AUP engagements and traditional audits, organizations can choose the most appropriate approach to address their specific needs and concerns, ensuring the credibility and reliability of their financial information. Remember, the key to a successful AUP engagement lies in clear communication and collaboration between you and your auditor.